The novel, 1984 is written by the author George Orwell. It’s a novel that gives a peek to the readers of a possible future where the administration has complete control of its citizens. Does the term “control” describe such a rule? The government overlooks every aspect of the life of citizens. Everything is under the party’s eye’s and rule. The government corrupts the minds of the population so there is no longer a line to keep the truth from lies. The government repeats announcements through telescreens everyday so the citizens are forced to believe in dumb statements gradually. While reading this novel, I can’t imagen that it can ever happen, but it’s now a reality in the world we live in. This paper will compare this novel to the Patriotic act.
Both the 1984 and the patriotic Act use surveillance for the wrong reasons, this is because they interfere with the freedom and the security of people. The patriotic act was created after the 9/11 tragedy (Kerr, p607). The American citizen wanted the feeling of safety after the tragedy, the government used this as the ultimate chance to gain more power over its citizens. Just like how the administration in Oceania makes the people believe in illogical statements, the citizens of the U.S. are made to believe that the Patriotic Act will promote security in the country. The Patriotic Act allows the government to search anyone’s location, tap into the phones of anyone and observe what the people are searching on the internet without any warrant. It’s not a measure to promote protection, but the government is gaining more power every day.
This can be compared with Orwell’s novel, 1984. In the novel, the people are ruled by The Big brother and the party. The individualism of everyone has ripped away. Someone is always monitoring the movement of everyone, and no one has the freedom to be alone. This is displayed when Winston Smith, who is the protagonist says, “The telescreens could be dimmed, but they was no way of shutting it off” (Orwell 2). According to this statement, telescreens are used to monitor all the moves made by the citizens even when they are unaware. This is similar to the Patriotic Act; no one knows when the government is spying on them. Citizens have the freedom to make private calls or search the web privately.
When the government has too much power over its citizen, they exploit the right of the people. People can no longer do what they want without the government monitoring. The people in the government can use this to their advantage other than for service to the people. The government will always be craving for more and more power over the citizens. No one will be able to predict what the government will do next. Very soon the all the freedom of the people will no longer be, and the lives of people will come back to the life of Winston Smith in the novel, 1984.
The American citenzry demanded change to protect people’s privacy form the government by the USA freedom act. The bill banned bulk collection of information from the phones records and internet metadata. I do not think this would be possible in Oceania; this is because everyone’s individualism in Oceania had been ripped away. The citizens in Oceania have been made to believe in illogical statements.

The novel, which takes place during the Great Depression, begins beside the River near, where two workers, Lennie and George, are walking on their way to a nearby ranch. As they walk along, George scolds Lennie for playing with a dead mouse and warns him not to speak when they arrive at their new place of employment. After they make up, George repeats to Lennie the of their dream that he and Lennie will raise enough money to buy a patch of land. George does not make a wise decision, George chooses to kill Lennie because of Lennie’s uncontrollable killing. Lennie does not mean to kill anyone but he is unaware of his strength. George thinks he is doing the right thing by killing Lennie, but really he is making a huge mistake. He believes that he is doing this for the sake of others but his decision if immoral. George was wrong for doing this, he does this for his benefit, and he is guilty. George killing Lennie is very immoral because Lennie does not know any better. Lennie is not killing people and animals on purpose he just underestimates his strength and does not realize that he is doing wrong. Lennie is innocent and does not deserve


I'm Piter!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out