Topic: Politics & GovernmentGovernment

Last updated: April 1, 2019

Is a liberalism being a good thing? Liberalism was a political principle that protecting and enriching the freedom of the individual to be the central problem especially in politics. We can say that it was based on equality and liberty which is a moral philosophy and political. Liberals adopt a wide range of views which is laissez-faire in the open market and other, but generally we support liberal as the civil rights, democracy, gender, freedoms of speech and other. John Locke was known as father of Liberalism and he was a philosopher. He stated that “all mankind being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions”, which is in his essay, Second Treatise of Government.
As we know, importance of sovereignty according to Niccolo Machiavelli was we need to use an absolute sovereignty for a successful state-building because it will keep us maintain the power. As for John Locke’s statement in paragraph one, liberalism was a good thing as it keeps us freedom and equality in life. He also against an absolute sovereignty, because he fixed with his own principle which is liberal principle that government’s power over individual should be limited. In my opinion, it’s great to use an absolute sovereignty for the state according to Niccolo Machiavelli as it used a force to eliminate political rivals, to persuade resistant populations and to eliminate the community of other men are strongly enough of a character to rule, who will inescapably attempt to replace the ruler. It would be a huge helper for the safety of the state and maintaining it but then if it too supreme in sovereignty, it would lead to absolutism and narrow nationalism as Niccolo Machiavelli suggested power politics is the ways and authoritarian absolute state is the end. Power politics cannot be end, it wouldl lead to autocracy and war. So, we also need to use John Locke’s assumption about liberal. My point was we still use the important of sovereignty but we need to know people’s consent and give them some freedom. For the instance, democracy. Democracy was a system that means responsible government and based on the people’s consent. People can elect their representative to run the government. Thus, these concepts would be applying well until now if it keeps safe in the track and didn’t too absolutism and liberalism.
For being too liberalism, it’s would provide the disabilities also. Although it was a good thing to give a freedom toward us, but if being too liberal would lead disadvantages for our states. For the example, people would try to take some advantages and being selfish then it would lead to subjugation toward ruler and be a huge problem for the country and the state. We can use Malaysia as the country’s example because they are using the democracy system that mainly use sovereignty as central of the state. The proof was the country was in good condition and still hoping to achieve Wawasan 2020.


I'm Piter!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out