A positive impact is observed in Agencies & Charities that have taken an initiative in trying to conserve the environment through recycling. A global awakening has been observed as there has been a reduced number of non-biodegradable waste that there before were seen scattered everywhere (Salomonson, 2014). This is a positive move in the recycling agencies and charities. With scientists forecasting that if there are zero changes in the world plastic consumption conducts and habits, there might be a more non-biodegradable waste in the oceans and lakes than there will be fish by 2050. It is no wonder that 2018 theme is “End Plastic Pollution”( Ekström, 2014).
With such an awakening, several agencies and organization have taken the initiative to curb the production of inorganic waste (Hanks, 2008). Example of such agencies includes; Accenture, which has made substantial advancement toward plummeting its environmental footmark and fostering justifiable growth, predominantly with respect to carbon discharges; reducing 53% in carbon dioxide emissions per member (Roedl, 2008). Another example is the Intel. Intel has been able to recycle up to more than 75% of the sub-total waste produced by its processes; in addition, a particular example was in 2013 whereby, the organization associated a percentage of employees’ recompense to inorganic waste metrics. Intel intends to attain zero hazardous discards to landfill by the year 2020 and recycling degrees of 92% for toxic discard. The third example of a company that has toiled to achieve a zero waste environment is the Estee Lauder (Blevis, 2008).
According to Forbes magazine, it is the third organization in the world that has led in control of non- biodegradable waste (Hawley, 2006). Since the year 2003, the firm’s 23 owned distribution and manufacturing amenities have depicted zero discards to landfill, and any discard that may be reprocessed is burnt and renewed to energy. At the worksite, the agency attained a recycling level of 87.5% in the year 2016, and since then has set an objective of 90% for the year 2017. Just but to mention another agency that has strived to reduce inorganic waste is Texas Instruments (Hawley, 2009). With this organization, Texas Instruments brands substantial investments to competently reuse, use, or recycle provisions crosswise its operations and decreases its probable environmental effect by obtaining materials sensibly, along with aptly handling waste disposal and handling. Each chief manufacture site everywhere in the world functions a robust recycling package for nonindustrial and industrial waste, for instance, recycling water that is used in each fabrication procedure by feeding efficacy plant preservation towers.
In 2018, as we think on how we may all struggle to Break Free of all Plastic use and disclosure, the effort of these firms is by now stirring the needle considerably decreasing the quantity of waste created and guided to landfill by their specific processes. Agencies across America and other parts of the world stand to acquire by the instance of corporations like these, and JUST Resources will endure trailing how they prime the custody in environmental influence, along with in their labors to shape and steer more just commercial procedure overall (Williams, 2009).
These agencies have transformed the world in several ways:
• The company has been able to recycle more than 84% of their refuse.
• These companies have made a robust obligation to environmental rehearses by founding environmental administration structures that comprise targets, objectives, measurement, and monitoring audits, drill, and presentation records.
Conferring to a current study and observation from Science Advance, ever since the discovery of plastic and other non-biodegradable waste in the year 1905-7, 8.19 billion metric tons of untampered (non-recycled) inorganic waste have been created, producing 6.19 billion metric tons of refuse, 78.9% of which has heaped up in the bare lands while a considerable percentage of 9% has already been recycled (Williams, 2011). An aggregate of 11.9 billion tons is projected to be in the bare lands or the environs by the year 2050 if existing manufacture and refuse management tendencies continue.
Collectively, as humans, we are all responsible for our involvement to the earth’s toxic waste and waste accumulation; large companies play an important part in either protecting and damaging the earth’s beautiful ecosystem (Williams, 2011).
In order to make this world a better place, it is a wakeup call for everyone; whether individual wise or institutional wise to take a place and strive to make this world a better place. Aided in the waste recycling.
Recycling is the procedure whereby it is the collection and processing of materials that would then be discarded away like garbage and then converting them into a brand new product. Recycling aids in benefitting both the community and the ecosystem.
Agencies that spearhead the fight of recycling have aided in the to make the surroundings unpolluted, preservation of material, they have aided in saving energy, and finally just but to mention a few they have reduced refuse in Landfills (Norris, 2012).
Recycling obliges two main functions: Primary, it avoid landfills and aids in decreasing water and air effluence and subsequently, valuable substantial like cans, aluminum, glass, and plastic are recycled in other kinds and not misused. Be watchful of what one does, paying a considerable degree of attention to the substances one buys and always examining oneself to evaluate if one really needs it or if it emanates in a package with less amount of waste. Copying from such agencies, we as the people to have a role in making a huge difference.
In conclusion, therefore, there is a positive impact in agencies and charity organization, which have spearheaded in a recycling of non- biodegradable waste. With the 2018 theme of “End Plastic Pollution,” there is reduced manufacture and consumption of inorganic waste. With such an awakening, several agencies and organization have taken the initiative to curb the production of inorganic waste (Ogawa, 2005). There is a probability that if more and more companies invent innovative ways of recycling, it is envisioned that by the year 2050, the world will be non-polluted whereby every animal; be it fish in the oceans or humans will have a friendly environment. It is empirical that more agencies strive to make this world a better place (Norris, 2009).
Ekström, K. M., & Salomonson, N. (2014). Reuse and recycling of clothing and textiles—A network approach. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(3), 383-399.
Hanks, K., Odom, W., Roedl, D., & Blevis, E. (2008, April). Sustainable millennials: attitudes towards sustainability and the material effects of interactive technologies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 333-342). ACM.
Hawley, J. M. (2006). Textile recycling: A systems perspective. In Recycling in textiles. Woodhead Publishing Limited, UK.
Hawley, J. M. (2009). Understanding and improving textile recycling: a systems perspective. In Sustainable Textiles (pp. 179-199).
Norris, L. (2012). Economies of moral fibre? Recycling charity clothing into emergency aid blankets. Journal of Material Culture, 17(4), 389-404.
Ongondo, F. O., & Williams, I. D. (2011). Mobile phone collection, reuse and recycling in the UK. Waste management, 31(6), 1307-1315.
Ogawa, S. (2005). The trade of second-hand clothes in the local mega city Mwanza, Tanzania: With special reference to the social networks of mali kauli transaction.